<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog.conigs.com &#187; mentos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.conigs.com/tags/mentos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.conigs.com</link>
	<description>post-production, video, films, and general foolishness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:45:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Online Video Attention Spans</title>
		<link>http://blog.conigs.com/2008/12/online-video-attention-spans/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.conigs.com/2008/12/online-video-attention-spans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>conigs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mentos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conigs.com/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know attention spans diminish rapidly once content moves online. With traditional mediums such as theater, television, and radio, you have a relatively captive audience (though I believe lessening as you go down that short list). True someone may get up during a TV show, but they&#8217;re still mostly just sitting there with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know attention spans diminish rapidly once content moves online. With traditional mediums such as theater, television, and radio, you have a relatively captive audience (though I believe lessening as you go down that short list). True someone may get up during a TV show, but they&#8217;re still mostly just sitting there with the sole purpose of watching the program on the box.</p>
<p>Online entertainment is a different story, especially for video-based content. Personally, I believe it is a combination of the &#8220;snack mentality&#8221; and multitasking. In the former, people just want a little bit of something. They usually don&#8217;t go online with the sole intent of watching this video or that, they go online to be entertained or gather news &amp; information. The specifics usually aren&#8217;t that important<sup><a href="http://blog.conigs.com/2008/12/online-video-attention-spans/#footnote_0_836" id="identifier_0_836" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="Notice I say &amp;#8220;usually.&amp;#8221; Sometime people fire up the YouTube for a certain video. Also, research is also a pretty targeted task. One doesn&amp;#8217;t often say &amp;#8220;You know, I think I&amp;#8217;m going to research&amp;#8230; something.&amp;#8221;">1</a></sup>.</p>
<p>More to the point, TubeMogul recently posted a study in which they <a href="http://www.tubemogul.com/research/index.php?r=18">tracked how long</a> users would watch a video. The results aren&#8217;t really surprising: Roughly 90% of people watch more than 10 seconds, while fewer than 10% will watch more than five minutes, which a fairly strait drop-off as you move between the two. Though there is a slightly larger dip once the one minute mark is passed.</p>
<p>Though, as with all statistics, the numbers make little sense without context.</p>
<blockquote><p>For a two-week period, we measured viewed-seconds for a sample of 188,055 videos, totaling 22,724,606 streams, on six top video sites</p></blockquote>
<p>So we know it&#8217;s from a variety of sites and (likely) a variety of different videos. The thing I believe is missing is <em>context</em>, namely the type of videos. For example, I have a fairly low tolerance for for shaky cell-phone footage of some dude wiping out on his bike. However, I will often watch most narrative (and the more traditional documentary) pieces through to the end, provided they are intriguing &amp; interesting.</p>
<p>Many times at work, we are constantly talking about this magical &#8220;two-minute threshold,&#8221; where if a video is longer than two minutes, it&#8217;s often too long. However, I tend to disagree. I don&#8217;t think there is a hard threshold. If something is engaging, people will watch, provided the <em>have</em> the time. There&#8217;s just a difference between watching someone else&#8217;s antics and being told a story.</p>
<p>For the sake of argument, many on-line videos are just images of something that (generally) regular people are doing. Dropping Mentos in Diet-Coke, someone&#8217;s kid doing something silly, high-school students left to their own devices with a camera<sup><a href="http://blog.conigs.com/2008/12/online-video-attention-spans/#footnote_1_836" id="identifier_1_836" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="If you&amp;#8217;re a high-school student and reading this, just put the camera down, seriously. Just think about what you are going to be documenting. Chances are, it&amp;#8217;s really not a good idea&amp;#8230; at all.">2</a></sup>&#8230; I, and I believe many people, just don&#8217;t have a high tolerance for any lengthy video in that category. I believe this is the reason for the rapid fall-off in the TubeMogul chart. Those videos just aren&#8217;t worth our attention when our time is finite.</p>
<p>What I would be curious to see is a break down of types of videos. I firmly believe that people will sit down and watch more of an online video if it is narrative or  a more traditional documentary. But I could be wrong. It&#8217;s been known to happen once-in-a-while.</p>
<p><span class="via">[via <a href="https://twitter.com/korrejohnson/status/1049223966">korrejohnson</a>]</span></p>
<p><span class="via">[update: also posted this on the <a href="http://blog.aboutfacemedia.com/2008/12/online-video-attention-spans.html">All About Face blog</a>.]<br />
</span></p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_836" class="footnote">Notice I say &#8220;usually.&#8221; Sometime people fire up the YouTube for a certain video. Also, research is also a pretty targeted task. One doesn&#8217;t often say &#8220;You know, I think I&#8217;m going to research&#8230; something.&#8221;</li><li id="footnote_1_836" class="footnote">If you&#8217;re a high-school student and reading this, just put the camera down, seriously. Just think about what you are going to be documenting. Chances are, it&#8217;s really not a good idea&#8230; at all.</li></ol>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.conigs.com/2008/12/online-video-attention-spans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

